Reflecting on the Demise of Bing Cashback Shopping

It’s been a while since Microsoft decided to close down it’s project (no, not talking about Kin), and now taking in the demise of Cashback, there’s a lot to reflect on.

My initial reaction was disappointment, because I had grown fond of Cashback’s Shopping program rolling in increasingly higher sales while still maintaining easy to manage ROI, based on Microsoft’s brilliant adjustable rate commission system. The hope was, that the program would continue to improve and grow in size as there should have been a lot of updates in the program’s maturation including more responsive content processing, better results pages, and the eventual move to Microsoft skimming some of the commission off the top. However, that never happened, and like most people I am looking for ways to replace performance after July 30th, when the shopping program will move to generating free natural traffic which will likely pull down sales significantly.

Now looking back after a few weeks to take it all in, there are several big takeaways from this announcement.

1) Making a commission based program work, is very very difficult.

Amazon makes it look easy, but really, how easy is it? Google has yet to get a successful program into production. Sure, Google Product Ad Listings is commission based for some, but Google is now putting together a CPC component, so how long will a commission based system be available before perhaps a move to the CPC structure is finalized? Personally, I think Google is accustomed to CPC programs, Google Ad Words  users were used to it, and that’s the direction this is going. So, all of this would have left Microsoft as the best and easiest option, not requiring an order integration beyond placing a tracking pixel, which most retail sites have in abundance anyway.

Microsoft’s attempts to bank roll the program for 2 years, ultimately was deemed to be a losing system because not enough traffic was being funneled through on a consistent basis (ie, not the mass adoption needed). It would have been nice, to set up a commission cut that would have justified keeping the program running longer to see what could be done. However, this seems to indicate the main commission based selling platform will continue to be Amazon.

2: Microsoft is great at killing things.

Really, that’s not fair. Any big company which acquires other companies and technologies, will naturally see some not integrate or die off. Take Google, which acquired and killed Dodgeball, the precursor of Dennis Crowley’s Foursquare. However, after pushing Cashback and Kin out the door recently, it does seems there is some momentum loss from the big launch of Bing. So, when looking at Microsoft programs that are not time honored institutions (looking at you Office 2010), it may be best to have a Plan B when planning ahead.

3. Q4 2010 is going to be very different from Q4 2009

Working within many tightly controlled retail calendars, I can say that almost everyone agrees the October through December defines the success of the year. There is such a flurry of sales in this period, that half the year should be devoted to planning it. That means when looking forward to Q4, a few expectations should be understood now:

A: Google and Amazon will be dominant.

The resulting hole in the traffic network which Cashback resided in, will likely most benefit Google and Amazon as both will become default destinations for shopping. Consumers will be plugging in a product search on Google.com, and those shoppers will be led through a network of well tuned Google shopping networks, including moving through Google Product Search, Google Product Ad Listings,  Google AdWords (not really Product Extensions, too few people click through), and Google’s natural results. Within those networks, Amazon will siphon some traffic away, even while increasingly larger numbers of people are starting in the first place, Amazon.com

Amazon’s site structure and ability to feed the right products to the right people, with a site layout and order satisfaction emphasis that ensures happy customers, Amazon continues to set the standard for what comparison engines wanted to be.

B. Consumers will look for discounts, still.

The Cashback program did show that discounts are still very compelling for consumers, it’s just those consumers need something simple instead of waiting 60 days to see if they get their discount. In addition to constructing discounts, retailers should explore any alternative selling technique that offers a discount, from participating in group discount sites like LivingSocial or GroupOn, to offering discount loyalty rewards on social networks like Twitter and Facebook. More and more, it’s clear that online sales are about communicating to people, not just placing an obvious checkout button.

So, 2010 does continue to be interesting in the realignment of online shopping, so I would expect some more key changes by the time October comes around.

Share

2 Responses to “Reflecting on the Demise of Bing Cashback Shopping”

  1. Eric Says:

    A good post Kevin. I completely agree with you that the death of Bing is a shame. Particularly so when there is clearly a desire for this type of program from the consumer side and, from the retail side, it is a huge win to have a fixed CPA from any given channel.

    From a retail perspective, I would argue that these sales aren’t so much dissipating as perhaps migrating back to the affiliate space. Since MSFT never really cultivated a strong search-based following for the service, they probably drew a large number of deal-sensitive customers from the affiliate space and many of those people will now return to that space. What do you think?

  2. Kevin Packler Says:

    Eric – great, thoughtful analysis. From my side, I haven’t seen good data on how much a part of Cashback’s traffic stream originated in affiliate space, although it seems reasonable to assume there must have been a sizable portion. To me it’s a waste, because I had a soft spot for Jellyfish and then the Cashback program that proceeded it. It’s a waste that Microsoft can’t capitalize on the branding energy put into the Cashback program.
    From the retail perspective, I do agree sales won’t dissipate, and the affiliate space may be a winner. It’s still nice to see the momentum in online shopping overall, and I think in the grand scheme of things, what retailers should focus most heavily on is that the pattern for consumer search that has been best established by Amazon and Google. What these two companies have been able to do over the past 1-2 years is fascinating.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.